Vorheriger Bericht
Sehr gut, kann aber besser ausbalanciert sein
Very research based/bad organization
Lack of organization across courses, bachelor's courses have major flaws in terms of organization.
Example for Math 2 SS 2023, no solutions were provided for questions, unless you attended a tutorial, what if one was occupied with work and didn't want to attend it? Are students supposed to come up with solutions from thin air? Is a student coming to learn or what?
Cysec 2, you attempt questions, answers are not uploaded, rather feedback is provided, so for example if you don't attempt a question, you will never have the answer.
This sort of issue extends to most courses, there should be sample answers, what happens if people are sick/ busy at work and can't attend tutorials? Sometimes it feels, like those who organize courses are just being pure lazy.
Professors(more than half the courses) don't care if you understand them, it's not about spoon feeding, rather if someone chooses to become a professor he/she should learn how to teach, rather what is important to some of them is to just do the course, read slides and talk as if it's some rap music, then they design an exam which eradicates half the students from the course so the pass avg is insane.
I mean organizational issues at the University ARE PLENTYYYYYYYY, it's not even a joke how many of them are there, for STATS Lab SS2023 the notes provided to study from were terrible, if you were studying the course for the first time you would understand nothing.
Once again, it's not about being spoon fed, but sample answers for all assignment sheets must be made generally so one has an idea of things one might not know, not everyone can attend tutorials. There is hard work and then there is also making life hard, which is sort of seen in a lot of courses again and again.
Software LAB 2023 was so pathetically organized that even the team of the professor was unable to complete the specification required.
The courses difficulty has much to do with a VERY research based approach rather than practicality, they want students who study here to end up becoming researchers here, so the courses are obviously at a higher level even because of that fact alone.
Example for Math 2 SS 2023, no solutions were provided for questions, unless you attended a tutorial, what if one was occupied with work and didn't want to attend it? Are students supposed to come up with solutions from thin air? Is a student coming to learn or what?
Cysec 2, you attempt questions, answers are not uploaded, rather feedback is provided, so for example if you don't attempt a question, you will never have the answer.
This sort of issue extends to most courses, there should be sample answers, what happens if people are sick/ busy at work and can't attend tutorials? Sometimes it feels, like those who organize courses are just being pure lazy.
Professors(more than half the courses) don't care if you understand them, it's not about spoon feeding, rather if someone chooses to become a professor he/she should learn how to teach, rather what is important to some of them is to just do the course, read slides and talk as if it's some rap music, then they design an exam which eradicates half the students from the course so the pass avg is insane.
I mean organizational issues at the University ARE PLENTYYYYYYYY, it's not even a joke how many of them are there, for STATS Lab SS2023 the notes provided to study from were terrible, if you were studying the course for the first time you would understand nothing.
Once again, it's not about being spoon fed, but sample answers for all assignment sheets must be made generally so one has an idea of things one might not know, not everyone can attend tutorials. There is hard work and then there is also making life hard, which is sort of seen in a lot of courses again and again.
Software LAB 2023 was so pathetically organized that even the team of the professor was unable to complete the specification required.
The courses difficulty has much to do with a VERY research based approach rather than practicality, they want students who study here to end up becoming researchers here, so the courses are obviously at a higher level even because of that fact alone.
- Some courses are made well
- Poor teaching of lecturers, lack of good organization across many courses. Sometimes it feels like lecturers teach for the sake of teaching and don't care if you understand or not.