I wasted 2 years of my life

Infrastructure Planning (MIP) (M.Sc.)

  • Studieninhalte
    1.0
  • Dozenten
    1.0
  • Lehrveranstaltungen
    1.0
  • Ausstattung
    1.0
  • Organisation
    2.0
  • Literaturzugang
    4.0
  • Digitales Studieren
    4.0
  • Gesamtbewertung
    2.0
The master program is really bad. I wasted 2 years of my life and 6000 euro on tuition fees. The courses in the programme are just an introduction there is nothing specific in them and most of the courses are not related to infrastructure planning like Statistics (we learned how to use excel), Case Study,... to be honest, there is no planning just courses collected from different programs like Waste and Warem. 95% of the courses require memorizing. I only used the calculator two times. Water and Power Supply and Sanitary Engineering those courses have nothing to do with infrastructure planning just general information you can get from Youtube.
Regional and Urban Planning I and II have 'planning' only in the name. Case Study, the professor is toxic, 6 months of working with no feedback. The name of the master is misleading. There are only 3 courses that are related to infrastructure out of 15. Traffic Engineering and Road Construction, Project Planning and Financing, and Contracting and Project Management (they are not that good but at least something close to infrastructure planning). The rest are just there to fill the curriculum.
  • easy
  • too general courses

Aktuelle Bewertungen zum Studiengang

3.4
Farid Ahmad , 29.11.2021 - Infrastructure Planning (MIP) (M.Sc.)
2.0
Jason , 24.08.2019 - Infrastructure Planning (MIP) (M.Sc.)

Über Elka

  • Alter: 24-26
  • Geschlecht: Divers
  • Studienbeginn: 2017
  • Studienform: Vollzeitstudium
  • Standort: Standort Stuttgart
  • Schulabschluss: Fachgebundene Hochschulreife
  • Weiterempfehlung: Nein
  • Geschrieben am: 18.02.2022
  • Veröffentlicht am: 28.02.2022